🔗 Share this article

This talented musician constantly bore the pressure of her parent’s heritage. As the daughter of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous UK musicians of the early 20th century, Avril’s identity was enveloped in the lingering obscurity of bygone eras.

A World Premiere

Earlier this year, I contemplated these legacies as I prepared to record the inaugural album of her piano concerto from 1936. Boasting intense musical themes, expressive melodies, and valiant rhythms, her composition will provide music lovers fascinating insight into how she – a wartime composer born in 1903 – imagined her reality as a female composer of color.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about the past. It can take a while to adapt, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to separate fact from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to confront the composer’s background for some time.

I had so wanted her to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, that held. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be heard in numerous compositions, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only look at the names of her parent’s works to see how he heard himself as not only a champion of UK romantic tradition as well as a voice of the Black diaspora.

This was where father and daughter seemed to diverge.

The United States assessed the composer by the excellence of his music rather than the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

As a student at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a Caucasian parent – turned toward his heritage. Once the poet of color the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in the late 19th century, the young musician eagerly sought him out. He set this literary work into music and the next year incorporated his poetry for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an worldwide sensation, particularly among the Black community who felt shared pride as American society assessed his work by the brilliance of his art rather than the his background.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not reduce Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he attended the First Pan African Conference in London where he met the Black American thinker this influential figure and saw a series of speeches, including on the subjugation of the Black community there. He was an activist to his final days. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders like Du Bois and the educator Washington, delivered his own speeches on racial equality, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the American leader on a trip to the US capital in that year. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so prominently as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He died in 1912, at 37 years old. But what would the composer have reacted to his child’s choice to be in this country in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist gives OK to apartheid system,” ran a headline in the African American magazine Jet magazine. Apartheid “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. When pushed to clarify, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with this policy “as a concept” and it “could be left to work itself out, overseen by well-meaning people of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more aligned to her family’s principles, or born in segregated America, she might have thought twice about apartheid. However, existence had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a British passport,” she said, “and the government agents never asked me about my background.” Thus, with her “fair” complexion (according to the magazine), she traveled alongside white society, lifted by their acclaim for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and conducted the national orchestra in the city, featuring the bold final section of her composition, subtitled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Even though a skilled pianist personally, she never played as the lead performer in her concerto. Instead, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era followed her lead.

She desired, in her own words, she “could introduce a change”. However, by that year, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials learned of her Black ancestry, she was forced to leave the country. Her UK document failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, embarrassed as the magnitude of her naivety became clear. “The lesson was a difficult one,” she lamented. Increasing her embarrassment was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Familiar Story

While I reflected with these legacies, I perceived a familiar story. The story of holding UK citizenship until it’s challenged – which recalls troops of color who served for the British in the global conflict and lived only to be refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,